Analisis normatif implementasi prinsip hukum progresif dalam praktik pembimbing kemasyarakatan: evaluasi restorative justice pada sistem peradilan pidana anak

  • Rizky Syahid Jamaludin 
    Universitas Singa Perbangsa Karawang
    Indonesia
  • Indra Yudha Koswara
    Universitas Singa Perbangsa
    Indonesia
  • Imam Budi Santoso
    Universitas Singa Perbangsa
    Indonesia

Abstract

Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (SPPA) di Indonesia menunjukkan pergeseran paradigma dari pendekatan retributif menuju keadilan restoratif melalui mekanisme Diversi, tetapi penerapannya masih menghadapi keterbatasan normatif dan implementatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis karakter Hukum Progresif dalam SPPA serta peran Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan (PK) dalam mewujudkan penanganan perkara yang berorientasi pada kepentingan terbaik anak. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan komparatif melalui library research. Bahan hukum meliputi UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 tentang SPPA, UU No. 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan, PERMA No. 4 Tahun 2014, serta Convention on the Rights of the Child, Beijing Rules, Tokyo Rules, dan General Comment No. 24. Bahan sekunder berupa jurnal, buku, literatur teori hukum, dan publikasi lembaga internasional dipilih secara purposive. Analisis dilakukan melalui identifikasi, klasifikasi, interpretasi, dan sintesis secara kualitatif-deskriptif dengan analisis normatif dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian mengidentifikasi tiga persoalan Diversi, yaitu pembatasan berdasarkan kategori tindak pidana, ketergantungan pada kesepakatan para pihak, dan kesenjangan antara kewajiban prosedural dengan tujuan restoratif. PK menjalankan lima fungsi utama, yaitu penelitian kemasyarakatan, pendampingan, fasilitasi Diversi, pembimbingan, dan pengawasan, yang menjadikannya penghubung antara norma hukum dan kondisi konkret anak.

Keywords
  • Hukum progresif,
  • Pembimbing kemasyarakatan,
  • Pidana anak,
  • Diversi,
  • Keadilan restoratif
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Jamaludin, R. S., Koswara, I. Y., & Santoso, I. B. (2026). Analisis normatif implementasi prinsip hukum progresif dalam praktik pembimbing kemasyarakatan: evaluasi restorative justice pada sistem peradilan pidana anak . Lentera Negeri, 7(1), 2042–2054. https://doi.org/10.29210/993880
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Abubakar, S., Febrianti, A. F., & Khumaerah, R. I. (2025). Peran Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan Pasca Penetapan Hasil Kesepakatan Diversi Pada Perkara Anak. Paulus Law Journal, 7(September), 98–115.
  2. Ananta, A. R. R., Wicaksono, D. B., Berliansyah, D. T., & Lestari, D. (2025). Criminal Limitations on Diversion of Children Against the Law Based on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System from a Comparative Perspective. JPHK: Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 6(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v6i2.26234
  3. Anggelina, A., Alfitri, Thamrin, M. H., & Lionardo, A. (2026). Diversion Policy for Children in Conflict with the Law: Evidence from Indonesia. Hongkong Journak of Social Sciences, 67, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55463/hkjss.issn.1021-3619.67.5
  4. Aulia, M. Z. (2018). Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo: Riwayat, Urgensi, dan Relevansi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185
  5. Casey, P., & Rottman, D. B. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence in the courts. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18(4), 445–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0798(2000)18:4<445::AID-BSL371>3.0.CO;2-J
  6. Dewi, R. A., Aprilianda, N., Mulyono, B. H., & Priadi, R. H. (2025). The Authority of Judges in The Application of Restorative Justice for Children in Indonesia. JHP: Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 14(2), 401–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.14.2.2025.401-424
  7. Gaffney, H., Jolliffe, D., Eggins, E., Ferreira, J. G., Skinner, G., Ariel, B., & Strang, H. (2024). Protocol: The effect of restorative justice interventions for young people on offending and reoffending: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1403
  8. Hamzah, R., Siku, A. S., & Hasan, Y. (2020). Efektivitas Fungsi Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan Dalam Pendampingan Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Pada Proses Diversi Tindak Pidana Pencurian. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 3(1), 19–25. https://postgraduate.universitasbosowa.ac.id/
  9. Hariyanto, D. R. S., & Swardhana, G. M. (2021). Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Yang Berorientasi Pada Restorative Justice di Kota Denpasar. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(3), 394–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i3.787
  10. J.D., D. B. W. (1993). Therapeutic jurisprudence and changing conceptions of legal scholarship. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 11(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370110103
  11. Kimbrell, C. S., Wilson, D. B., & Olaghere, A. (2023). Restorative justice programs and practices in juvenile justice: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis for effectiveness. Criminology & Public Policy, 22(1), 161–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12613
  12. Maran, A. M., Probowati, Y., & Elisabeth, M. P. (2024). Proses Diversi Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum: Belajar dari Sistem Diversi di Amerika Serikat. Binamulia Hukum, 13(2), 555–571. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.957
  13. Mears, D. P., Kuch, J. J., Lindsey, A. M., Siennick, S. E., Pesta, G. B., Greenwald, M. A., & Blomberg, T. G. (2016). Juvenile Court and Contemporary Diversion Helpful, Harmful, or Both? Criminology & Public Policy, 15(3), 953–981. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12223
  14. Meliala, & Afarly, M. (2024). Pengaruh Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Efektivitas Penyelesaian Kasus Pidana: (Studi Pada Kasus Tindak Pidana Anak di Indonesia). Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 6(10).
  15. Moyn, S. (2024). Reconstructing Critical Legal Studies.
  16. Ms, L. S. (2021). When Chilren’s Rights Are at Stake, Shall Court Remain Silent? Analysis on The Implemetation of Passivity of Judge Principle in Child Marriage Dispensation in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Review, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v11n1.693
  17. Muema, F. M., & Kawałek, A. (2024). Therapeutic and non-therapeutic practices in the child justice system in Kenya: A therapeutic jurisprudence perspective. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 95.
  18. Pappas, L. N., & Dent, A. L. (2023). The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 19, 1–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z
  19. Petrosino, A., & Turpin-petrosino, C. (2010). Formal System Processing of Juveniles: Effects on Delinquency. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 1–88. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2010.1
  20. Prahanela, R., Purwadi, H., & Hartiwiningsih. (2017). Kegagalan implementasi diversi pada tahap penuntutan. Jurnal Pasca Sarjana Hukum UNS, 5(1), 80–88.
  21. Rahardjo, S. (2016). Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 1(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.1.1.1-24
  22. Rahayu, S., & Wibawa, I. (2024). Peran Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan Bapas Pati Dalam Proses Diversi Anak yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan. Jurnal Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 7(1), 180–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v7i1.180-188
  23. Rahmawati, D., & Bawono, B. T. (2021). The Community Participation in the Implementation of Diversion at Investigation Level. LDJ: Law Development Journal, 3(4), 808–818.
  24. Rasdi, & Arifin, S. (2020). Efektifitas Metode Musyawarah Mufakat Diversi terhadap Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Berkonflik dengan Hukum. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 15(1), 44–52.
  25. Rismana, D., Maskur, A., Permonoputri, R. M. L. F., Hariyanto, & Hariz, H. S. S. (2025). The Legal Effectiveness of Juvenile Diversion : A Study of the Indonesian Juvenile Justice System The Legal Effectiveness of Juvenile Diversion : A Study of the Indonesian Juvenile Justice System. Khazanah Hukum, 7(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i2.44162
  26. Robert F. Schopp Ph.D., J.D., P. D. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence: integrated inquiry and instrumental prescriptions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17(5), 589–605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199923)17:5<589::AID-BSL368>3.0.CO;2-3
  27. Rossner, M., & Taylor, H. (2024). The Transformative Potential of Restorative Justice : What the Mainstream Can Learn from the Margins. Annual Reviews of Criminology, 7, 357–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-040921
  28. Schwalbe, C. S., Gearing, R. E., MacKenzie, M. J., Brewer, K. B., & Ibrahim, R. (2012). A meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programs for juvenile offenders. Cliinical Psychology Review, 32(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.10.002
  29. Shem-Tov, Y., Raphael, S., & Skog, A. (2024). Can Restorative Justice Conferencing Reduce Recidivism? Evidence From the Make-it-Right Program. Econometrica, 92(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA20996
  30. Sitepu, S., Fernando, Z. J., Sary, W. E., & Taniady, V. (2025). The Effectiveness of Non-Custodial Sanctions in Juvenile Justice: An Empirical Study on the Implementation of Restorative Justice in Bengkulu. Journal of Judicial Review, 27(2), 573–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v27i2.11057
  31. Sliva, S. M., & Plassmeyer, M. (2021). Effects of restorative justice pre-file diversion legislation on juvenile filing rates: An interrupted time-series analysis. Criminology & Public Policy, 20, 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12518
  32. Strang, H., Sherman, L. W., Mayo-wilson, E., Woods, D., & Ariel, B. (2013). Restorative Justice Conferencing (RJC) Using Face-to-Face Meetings of Offenders and Victims: Effects on Offender Recidivism and Victim Satisfaction. A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2013.12
  33. Suherlan, D. (2022). Peran Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Mediator Dalam Proses Diversi Anak yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 10(1), 182–189.
  34. Sukardi, S., & Purnama, H. R. (2022). Restorative Justice Principles in Law Enforcement and Democracy in Indonesia. JILS: Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(1), 155–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.53057
  35. Susanto, S., Iqbal, M., & Supriyatna, W. (2020). Menciptakan Sistem Peradilan Efisien Dengan Sistem E-Court Pada Pengadilan Negeri Dan Pengadilan Agama Se-Tangerang Raya. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 6(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v6i1.287
  36. Susila, M. E., & Farhansyah, B. Y. (2024). Protecting Children Rights through the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia: Issues and Challenges. Jurnal Mercatoria, 17(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v17i1.11122
  37. Taufiqurokhman, S., & Sodikin. (2025). The Effectiveness of a Restorative Justice Based Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Preventing Recidivism. Journal of Lex et Justitia, 1(1), 1–17.
  38. Tobing, S. J. A. B. (2024). Diversion Program Implementation Under the Juvenile Justice System Act in Indonesia: What Works, What Does Not? Restorative Journal of Indonesian Probation and Parole System, 2(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.61682/restorative.v2i1.12
  39. Vooren, M., Rud, I., Cornelisz, I., Klaveren, C. Van, Groot, W., & Brink, H. M. Van Den. (2023). The effects of a restorative justice programme (Halt) on educational outcomes and recidivism of young people. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 19, 691–711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-022-09502-4
  40. Watkins, M. N. (2024). The impact of therapeutic jurisprudence on juvenile recidivism: The country road to rehabilitation. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 75(4), 21–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12270
  41. Waulayadi, Muslikhahi, & Mariana, M. (2024). When Diversion Fails: How the System Betrays the Best Interest of Children in Conflict with the Law. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 9(2), 547–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.5972
  42. Wexler, D. B. (1998). Therapeutic jurisprudence in a comparative law context. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 15(3), 233–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199722/06)15:3<233::AID-BSL263>3.0.CO;2-S
  43. Wilson, D. B., Brennan, I., & Olaghere, A. (2018). Police-initiated diversion for youth to prevent future delinquent behavior: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 14(1), 1–85. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2018.5
  44. Wilson, H. A., & Hoge, R. D. (2013). The Effect of Youth Diversion Programs on Recidivism: A Meta-Analytic Review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(5), 497–518. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812451089
  45. Zubaedah, S., Tira, A., & Almusawir. (2023). Implementation of Diversion on Examining the Process of Children in Conflict with the Law. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 11(1), 221–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i1.777

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 58 times
PDF
: 25 times